Showing posts with label Straits Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Straits Times. Show all posts

Sunday, May 2, 2010

ST Editor admitted that it is a "government mouthpiece"


From: "truth"
Speaking during a dialogue session organised for forum writers to the
Straits Times, ST Editor Han Fook Kwang admitted that the paper suffered
from a perception that it is a " government mouthpiece". But he got the
cheek to say with tongue-in-cheek: "But the test is if our readers believe
in the paper and continue to buy it". It is pathetic that Mr. Han, who is
just a cog in the massive government propaganda organisation is trying to
ape his political masters in continuing to hoodwink the people as to the
insidious political role of the Straits Times. What Mr. Han says about the
Straits Times is not important because he is impotent himself and is not in
a position where he can in any way influence the policy of the Straits
Times.

What is of more concern to the discerning Singaporeans is whether there is
freedom of the press in Singapore. Reporters without Borders ranked
Singapore media 133th in terms of press freedom among 175 countries last
year. Can there be press freedom when the mainstream media is tightly
controlled by a forbidding organisation like the Singapore Press Holdings
(SPH)? It is not some kind of benevolent organisation but an omnipotent body
formed by the government to oversee the mainstream media, especially the
Straits Times, in its dissemination of government propaganda. At the head of
SPH is none other than a former deputy prime minister who is also the spin
doctor.

Under the circumstances, it will be naive to think that press freedom exists
in Singapore. What the mainstream media,especially the Straits Times, dishes
out to the public is what the government wants the public to read. Views,
opinions or articles inimical to the government, especially from opposition
parties, will find it extremely hard to get publicity, esecially in the
Straits Times. Even letters unflattering to the government sent to the Forum
suffered the same fate.

We will see the true colour of the mainstream media, especially the Straits
Times, during the hustings for the General Election. Under the tight control
of SPH, the PAP will have monopoly of the mainstream media, probably to the
exclusion of the opposition parties. The opposition parties will most likely
have to rely on the new media to support their election campaign. The
Straits Times, being a government mouthpiece, is not likely to lend a hand
to the opposition campaign. It will be just wishful thinking.

Although Singapore's population has increased, Straits Times circulation has
shown a decline. It claims an inflated readership of 1.4 million. This shows
that there are Singaporeans who cease to read the Straits Times because they
are disgusted with its pro-government propaganda. These are the people who
turn to the internet for their supply of local and foreign news and they
could form a fairly substantial number. There are also some who read the
Straits Times for its sports, social and financial news, skipping its
propaganda.

One will have to be cynical to believe that there is press freedom in
Singapore. This, at best, depends on the charitable whim of the powers that
be.
Posted by Singapore Recalcitrant

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Why ST apologised to ex-Director CPIB?

From: "truth"
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:29:15 GMT
Local: Thurs, Oct 15 2009 11:29 pm
Subject: Why ST apologised to ex-Director CPIB?

Simple, to prevent him for spilling more skeleton from the
cupboard.

As ex-Director CPIB and ex-Director ISD he sure has
access to lots of the dark secrets of LKY and his gangsters.
This man can do the papist leegime lots of damages.
In one posting on his blog, he has exposed LKY as a liar in
a Parliamentary Select Committe Hearing. This in itself is an
offence. Will the AG charged LKY for misleading a Parliamentary
Select Committe ?

Monday, October 5, 2009

Sunday Times removed article on Singapore PR Zhang Yuanyuan taking part in China National Day parade

From: beng1 <5191 ...="" gmail.com="">
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 6 2009 12:57 pm
Subject: Sunday Times removed article on Singapore PR Zhang Yuanyuan taking part in China National Day parade

from TemasekReview.com

An article on the digital edition of the Sunday Times titled
“Singapore PR took part in parade” has mysteriously disappeared!

The article which relates a Singapore PR by the name of Zhang
Yuanyuan, who chose to return to Beijing and took part in China’s 60th
National Day parade was still available in the morning of 4 October
2009 under the “Home” section, but by the afternoon, it was nowhere to
be found.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Shitty Times bullshit to cover Temasek rotten arses

From: rainbow12345...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jun 5 2009 11:04 pm
Subject: Re: Shitty Times bullshit to cover Temasek rotten arses

We have a bunch oh shit head now leading in Temasek ang GIC.
They are starting to lose our reserve built up during Goh Chok Tong's
time.

> Shitty Times tried to cover Temasek decision to sell their
> Barclays shares at a huge lost on fear that the Bank may be
> nationalised.
> If this is correct then the managers at Temasek must be
> dam ignorant and stupid.
> Because in Oct 2008 when the Arabs bought into Barclays
> it was widely reported that a condition of the Arab investment
> was that Barclays will be prevented from government money
> which in a way prevent Barclays from being nationalise.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Straits Times still pushing for homo sexual agenda

From: baldeagle
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 22:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 13 2009 1:44 pm
Subject: Straits Times ...still pushing for homo sexual agenda. It is time, for the publisher should change the editorial team.

Straits Times continue to push their homo sexual agenda...by
publishing articles in the Forum page in support of deviant (not
mainstream) values ...and censoring pro-main stream articles.

Today, a writer in Forum ...try to justify the reinstatement of
AWARE's homo sexuality program in school, by saying that the
internet, cinema, songs glorify popular (homo sexual) culture . and as
such, MOE should allow outside contractor to offer sex education
programs on alternative 'views'... to under age students (to be in
line with the so-called 'popular culture'). Formal sex education
offered by schools now and values taught at homes by parents are not
good enough.

The Editor's heading say that instilling values is a complex task and
imply that MOE and the parents are not up to the task.

Such irrational arguments/insinuations are being promoted in Straits
Times nowadays. Time to change the editorial team.


Newsgroups: soc.culture.singapore
From: mrthinkt...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 04:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Straits Times ...still pushing for homo sexual agenda. It is time, for the publisher should change the editorial team.

On May 12, 10:44 pm, baldeagle wrote:
> Straits Times continue to push their homo sexual agenda...by
> publishing articles in the Forum page in support of deviant (not
> mainstream) values ...and censoring pro-main stream articles.

> Today, a writer in Forum ...try to justify the reinstatement of
> AWARE's homo sexuality program in school, by saying that the
> internet, cinema, songs glorify popular (homo sexual) culture . and as
> such, MOE should allow outside contractor to offer sex education
> programs on alternative 'views'... to under age students (to be in
> line with the so-called 'popular culture'). Formal sex education
> offered by schools now and values taught at homes by parents are not
> good enough.

> The Editor's heading say that instilling values is a complex task and
> imply that MOE and the parents are not up to the task.

> Such irrational arguments/insinuations are being promoted in Straits
> Times nowadays. Time to change the editorial team.

it is amazing how this letter deserve a prominent space in the ST
Forum. The writer
at the conclusion said that students shoud be given a chance to give
their views. Doesnt
he know the purpose of eduction for this young group is to mould their
character for later years in life. If they can decide on matters like
this they need not go to school . At later later years in life they
can make their own decisions. i think Something
is amiss in ST group on this matter.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.singapore, soc.culture.malaysia, soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.british
From: "LobertEatSHIT"
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 21:19:18 +0800
Local: Wed, May 13 2009 9:19 pm
Subject: Re: Straits Times ...still pushing for homo sexual agenda. It is time, for the publisher should change the editorial team.

wrote in message

news:fe456ae7-1b72-4ea1-8637-3653c34e49c1@d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 10:44 pm, baldeagle wrote:

> The Editor's heading say that instilling values is a complex task and
> imply that MOE and the parents are not up to the task.

> Such irrational arguments/insinuations are being promoted in Straits
> Times nowadays. Time to change the editorial team.

Hehe...even the name of the writer is
a give away...
All these are gay and lesbos trying to
sound "logical" in trying to promote their
gay lifestyle. They are now using fancy euphemism
for the word gay...."alternative", "current"....with the
intent of fooling the gullible and the young.

These arse lovers have been given the green
light to promote their agenda in medias and being
promoted as the "in" crowd to attract the young.
In the old days, these weirdos will be laughed at
and derided if they ever dare to go public....now
will all the possible gay kangaroos and ministers
already hiding in the system, they have been emboldened
by the "protection" by these big brothers...

Soon, all these gays may even takeover the government
and even decide that heterosex is illegal. A sure sign
that its the end of stinkapoor, just like Rome did.
LOL.

>it is amazing how this letter deserve a prominent space in the ST
>Forum.

Hehe...surely this is a sign that the editorial is
full of arse lovers who are insidiously giving a
leg up to their brethren to push their common agenda.
Note that we even have a minister with a girl sounding
name...
LOL.

> The writer
>at the conclusion said that students shoud be given a chance to give
>their views.

Ahhh...this is their secret agenda...to empower the
young to be able to decide so that the parents cannot
intervene....just like they did in UK.
Knowing full well that their propaganda is more likely
to convert the young than the battle hardened older
folks....so they will try to legislate that the older citizens
including parents, can no longer hold back the gay
desires of their children....result...MORE GAYS for
stinkapoor.
Next time NS will be full of AKUAS...
LOL.